President Trump publicly urged Cuba to reach an agreement with the United States “before it is too late,” hinting at potential regime change by proposing Secretary of State Marco Rubio—a Cuban-American critic of Havana’s government—as a possible Cuban leader. In response, Díaz-Canel reiterated Cuba’s non-negotiable position against political concessions, framing the island as steadfast in its anti-imperialist historic identity and resistant to coercion or intimidation. Official events in Havana paid tribute to the fallen military personnel with rallies condemning US actions and asserting national sovereignty. The Cuban government’s posture underscores continued hostility yet indicates a measured approach to dialogue, emphasizing legal principles and reciprocity.
Economic analysts highlight Cuba’s deteriorating financial position, with losses estimated at $7.5 billion since early 2024 due to sanctions and pandemic disruptions, and view the disrupted Venezuelan support as a critical risk factor. The deepening energy shortfall is expected to further strain infrastructure and living standards. Mexico and China have expressed willingness to facilitate dialogue or maintain support, though diplomatic engagement remains limited under current conditions. The intensifying Cuban-US impasse underlines geopolitical volatility in Latin America’s energy and security landscape.
This article was curated and published as part of our South American energy market coverage.
