The union also described the government’s abandonment of Ancap’s collective labor agreements, coupled with new labor negotiations, as indicative of broader efforts to shrink the company. Rodríguez referenced the historical neoliberal reforms of the 1990s and early 2000s, including partial privatizations and the closing of oil installations such as El Espinillar, as preludes to the current political agenda. Disagreements within the ruling coalition—between the National Party, which pursues more liberalized fuel policies, and the Colorado Party, along with opposition from Cabildo Abierto—have moderated but not halted these policy shifts.
Fancap highlights the risk that reducing Ancap’s scope will erode state capacity in socioeconomic areas designed to protect vulnerable populations, such as subsidized fuel programs. The union expects intensified debates leading up to the October referendum on legal reforms that seek to limit government intervention. The evolving fuel market structure in Uruguay is thus positioned for significant transformation under political pressures advocating deregulation and private sector expansion, which could reshape both pricing dynamics and supply security in the medium term.
This article was curated and published as part of our South American energy market coverage.



