One primary alternative involves utilizing internal Colombian infrastructure by reactivating routes through Babillas, Guadúas, and Vasconia to transport crude to the Oleoducto Central (Central Pipeline), followed by shipment to the Colombian port of Coveñas. This option would require the deployment of approximately 150 trucks to move crude to the pipeline, generating logistics challenges but offering tariff costs between $12 and $15 per barrel—still significantly below Ecuador’s new tariff. Although highly demanding operationally, this route offers a financially feasible short-term solution to circumvent Ecuador’s tolls.
Another potential route under review is the reactivation of the OTA itself, which could reconnect southwestern Colombian oil fields to Pacific ports. This option faces significant hurdles, including a $20 million investment, months of refurbishment, and navigating a high-conflict zone with Indigenous Awá communities. Ecopetrol has mandated technical, environmental, and economic feasibility studies to ensure compliance with environmental standards and social safeguards before proceeding.
The tariff conflict reflects broader diplomatic tensions between Colombia and Ecuador and has intensified discussions on regional trade integration and energy security. Ecopetrol is coordinating with Colombian ministries and diplomatic channels to resolve the tariff impasse while maintaining export commitments. The company also deals with internal security challenges along existing pipelines, including illegal valve theft affecting volumes.
Ecopetrol’s near-term export strategy and infrastructure investments will significantly impact the Colombian oil supply chain, regional energy markets, and bilateral relations with Ecuador in 2026.
This article was curated and published as part of our South American energy market coverage.



