The crisis escalated when De la Espriella issued direct appeals to Colombia’s security forces, explicitly instructing the military to protect the constitution and democratic order while refusing to follow any directive from Petro that would impede the transfer of power. He called on the international community to monitor the political process closely. De la Espriella characterized the outgoing government as corrupt and accused Petro of orchestrating a coup attempt to retain power beyond his constitutional mandate.
Colombia’s Defense Minister confirmed the armed forces remain committed to constitutional authority, stating the military recognizes the current president’s mandate and will recognize the incoming president from August 7 forward. The minister emphasized that security forces are bound to the constitution and law, dismissing any ambiguity about institutional loyalty during the transition.
Spain’s President Pedro Sánchez publicly recognized De la Espriella’s legitimacy, stating that electoral authorities have already determined who will assume the presidency on August 7. This international backing contrasts with Petro’s position, though the outgoing president ultimately confirmed he will transfer power on the constitutional date.
The Petro government’s transition committee, led by Finance Minister Germán Ávila, subsequently requested all ministers halt transition meetings and called for a review of statements made by De la Espriella’s team before resuming talks. The government cited persistent personal attacks and inappropriate rhetoric as reasons conditions were unsuitable for continuing the institutional handover process.
International electoral observers validated the June election’s transparency, finding no evidence supporting claims of manipulation. De la Espriella won by a narrow margin against Cepeda, who acknowledged the results but declared himself in civil disobedience against the incoming administration, citing De la Espriella’s United States citizenship. Political figures from opposition parties backed the suspension decision, warning of potential democratic rupture.
This article was curated and published as part of our South American energy market coverage.
Discover more from Nyland South Energy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



