Despite these measures, multiple environmental organizations, including the Assembly for a Fossil-Free Sea and the Society for Biodiversity Conservation of Maldonado, condemned the decisions. They criticized the approvals for contradicting Uruguay’s energy transition policies and undermining its renewable energy achievements. These groups argue that the mitigation provisions are insufficient and challenging to enforce, citing a pending legal injunction on the matter. Additionally, the Red Coastal Union decried procedural shortcomings, asserting that public and expert input lacked substantive influence on the final authorizations, contravening the Escazú Agreement’s mandates for meaningful environmental participation.
In contrast, Minister Edgardo Ortuño emphasized the government’s commitment to biodiversity protection, reporting enhanced safeguards protecting marine mammals and turtles, as well as ecosystem monitoring protocols. The Ministry of Environment will oversee compliance throughout exploration activities.
The seismic authorization follows Uruguay’s National Environmental Law N°17.283 (2000) and complementary regulations stipulating environmental impact assessments for hydrocarbon extraction projects. Concurrently, political and civil society disputes persist over enforcement integrity and alleged irregularities in the permitting process, underscoring tensions between economic interests in fossil fuel exploration and environmental governance in Uruguay’s offshore sector.
This article was curated and published as part of our South American energy market coverage.



